Best close combat weapon

[kiltedninja]

Angekfire, Unnamedbaby, you're fighting a losing battle, I'm telling you to give up, he's set in his ways.

[Bob]

Thats why it's funny.

The best close combat weapon bar none is a 9mm pistol.
High capacity, low recoil.

Although check this puppy out based on a Glock 17

[homelitexl]

i like that bob

[Onslaught]

modern day sword.

[unnamedbaby77]

I like this one ...SUPER low recoil 45 ACP








or one of these!(in case you are wondering that is a magazine fed 12ga shotgun under that AR there)

[Darkness]

"This isn't exactly a gun thread, and we do have many fine threads on Guns. Please use them for the Gun Talk, thank you."

[mattifikation]

That Kriss is ridiculous. The mechanics probably do absolutely nothing except provide a few possible points of failure, and the real reason the recoil is reduced is probably because of all that extra weight. It also serves no purpose, in the era of PDW's with armor piercing ammunition and submachinegun sized assault rifles.

[unnamedbaby77]

as was just pointed out this isnt a gun thread. that being said I will not get into the five seven/krinkov debate .

I will however say that when choosing ANY equipment I look at what the different spec ops units around the world use. ... those fellas seem to know their stuff

[kiltedninja]

Originally Posted by unnamedbaby77

as was just pointed out this isnt a gun thread. that being said I will not get into the five seven/krinkov debate .

I will however say that when choosing ANY equipment I look at what the different spec ops units around the world use. ... those fellas seem to know their stuff

They use what they're issued like the rest of the military units. Not to mention that a lot of the stuff they do use isn't necessarily available to civilians.

I'd look at the weapons themselves. What are their pros and cons, weight, ergonomics, ease of maintenance, reliability, durability, effectiveness and efficiency, and of course there's always the badass factor.

[unnamedbaby77]

Originally Posted by kiltedninja

They use what they're issued like the rest of the military units. Not to mention that a lot of the stuff they do use isn't necessarily available to civilians.

trust in me or research if you have to, deployed special forces units do whatever they please with whichever gear they wish in the field.

Originally Posted by kiltedninja

I'd look at the weapons themselves. What are their pros and cons, weight, ergonomics, ease of maintenance, reliability, durability, effectiveness and efficiency, and of course there's always the badass factor.

which is exactly why I watch spec ops because that is their main agenda when choosing weapons


hence the H&K MK 23 and USP
http://www.remtek.com/arms/hk/civ/mark23/mark23.htm'


EDIT: SORRY SORRY SORRY I promise no more gun stuff!

[unnamedbaby77]

Originally Posted by mattifikation

Hey, I think you got something stuck to your nose there. :-p

is it poo? damn!

and I do agree if i am close enough to have to use my sidearm I have messed up somehow .

I like the assault rifle range for the reason that you can still get close enough to use explosives in a decent amount of time and you aren't waiting 4 seconds from the time you fire to the time the bullet impacts .


P.S. hows this for a CQB weapon: this guy tied to a stick!

[Undead Jackal]

Shovel because if you read wwz
In the Kyoto there is a blind man that kills ons of zeds witha spade